EST. 2023
Independent Student Journalism

Les Comrades

Truth Takes Effort
Latest Articles All articles
More From Press Corps All videos
The Archive

All articles

Search, filter, sort, and browse every published piece.

Back to articles

The Morality of The Death Penalty

Some argue the capital punishment delivers justice. Others argue it crosses a moral line that no state should cross. Les Comrades explores the ethics of the death penalty and the enduring question of whether justice can coexist with irreversible punishment.

The death penalty has always been one of the most debated punishments in society. Some people strongly support it, while others believe it is morally wrong no matter what crime a person has committed.

Supporters of capital punishment argue that criminals who commit crimes like terrorism, serial murder, rape, or mass killings do not deserve another chance at life. According to them, execution is the highest form of justice because certain crimes are too brutal to be forgiven.

Many people also believe that the death penalty gives closure to victims' families. Violent crimes do not only take away lives; they leave behind trauma, fear, grief, and emotional damage that can continue for years. For families who have lost someone, life imprisonment may feel unfair because the criminal is still alive while the victim lost everything forever. In such cases, execution is often seen as justice rather than revenge.

Another argument used in support of the death penalty is deterrence. Governments in many countries claim that fear of execution can stop people from committing violent crimes. Supporters also argue that some criminals are too dangerous to ever return to society, and execution permanently removes the possibility of escape or repeated violence.

However, despite these arguments, the morality of the death penalty still remains deeply controversial. One major reason is that justice systems are not perfect. Courts are run by human beings, and human beings are capable of mistakes, corruption, political pressure, and bias. Across different countries, innocent people have later been discovered on death row after years of wrongful conviction. A prison sentence can be reversed, but an execution cannot. Once a person is killed by the state, there is no way to correct that mistake.

The debate also raises serious moral questions.

Society teaches people that killing another human being is wrong, yet the death penalty allows the state to kill legally in the name of justice. Critics argue that this creates a contradiction where violence is condemned in one situation but accepted in another. According to them, justice should not become another form of revenge.

Another important argument against the death penalty is that it often reduces punishment to a single moment of death, while the suffering caused to victims can last an entire lifetime. Many victims survive violent crimes but continue living with psychological trauma, fear, social isolation, and emotional pain for years. Compared to that suffering, some people believe execution becomes an easy escape for criminals rather than meaningful accountability.

Critics also argue that punishment should not only focus on ending someone's life, but on preventing future crimes and changing society itself. Many criminals already know that they may face execution, yet they still commit violent acts. For some offenders, death is not frightening enough to stop them. This raises doubts about whether the death penalty actually prevents crime or simply punishes people after the damage has already been done.

Because of this, many people believe society should focus on punishments that create long-term impact instead of simply taking another life. They argue that punishments should be strict enough to discourage future criminals and make society safer without normalising killing as a solution. According to this perspective, no institution or individual truly has the moral right to take another human life, even in the name of justice.

Economic inequality also affects this debate. In many countries, poor individuals often receive weaker legal defense compared to wealthy people. As a result, critics argue that the death penalty sometimes punishes the most vulnerable people within flawed systems instead of delivering equal justice.

In the end, the debate surrounding the death penalty is not only about crime and punishment. It is about morality, justice, and the kind of society people want to create. A nation's response to violence reflects its values, humanity, and understanding of justice itself. Whether capital punishment represents true justice or simply another form of violence remains one of the most difficult moral questions in modern society.

The Desk

Press Corps

Videos, field reports, interviews, and visual coverage.

About Les Comrades

Who
we
are.

Independent student journalism for difficult conversations.

WE ARE an independent student run newspaper addressing the issues no one wants to talk about or won’t discuss.

We ask the difficult questions, explore the uncomfortable truths, and believe informed minds shape a better tomorrow. Focusing on politics, economics, international relations, and many more.

Our goal is simple: to let you, the reader, decide.

We are the leaders of tomorrow, and your opinions can change the world because your opinions shape your decisions. As Napoleon once said, “Nothing is more difficult and therefore more precious, than to be able to decide.” Our team works to empower you to make informed decisions and, ultimately, change the world.

Our Values
01

Truth takes effort

We believe informed opinions require research, discussion, and difficult questions.

02

Readers decide

We present ideas and perspectives so readers can shape their own decisions.

03

Leaders of tomorrow

We believe student voices matter because today’s discussions shape tomorrow’s world.

Journalism is printing what someone else does not want printed; everything else is public relations.
George Orwell

Da
Heads.

Editorial Board | Student Leadership

Les Comrades is built by students who write, edit, argue, fact check, design, publish, and protect the stories that rarely get space elsewhere.

Join the newsroom.
Shape the conversation.

Les Comrades is always looking for student writers, editors, and press correspondents who want to question, investigate, and build independent journalism.

Open Roles Writers · Editors · Press Corps
Eligibility Open to students and young contributors

Apply to join

Applications are reviewed by the editorial team before we respond.

Application sent successfully.

Reach out.
Pitch a story.

Have a tip, a story idea, or want to write for us? We are always looking for voices that do not get heard elsewhere.

Email lescomrades@gmail.com
Instagram @les.comrades
Response Within 3 to 5 working days

Send us a pitch

Submissions are read by the editorial team. Tips and pitches stay with Les Comrades.

Message sent. We'll be in touch soon.